Of course where a 10 mark question requires candidates to assess two reasons or effects then there is a requirement to move beyond substantially evaluating one major point.Ī purely theoretical answer which is not applied to the context or does not refer to the data cannot achieve Level 3 for KAA.
Cardinal chains level 80 youtube full#
This, followed by one substantial applied evaluative point, which answers the broad elements of the question through a coherent chain of reasoning, is sufficient to obtain full marks on one page.
One substantial point is enough assuming it demonstrates an understanding of the concept in context, is fully integrated and answers the broad element of the question (perhaps connecting mini points well applied). There are examples of candidate responses scoring full marks in the following examiners' reports: This structure really helps the examiners follow a candidate’s answer. The best responses show a very clear structure to the answer, with two points identified, explained and with context quoted from the extracts before providing one or two evaluation points. On short questions such as this the knowledge marks are for identifying the causes and there are no definition marks. If you are asked for causes, reasons, effects or similar, then there is no good reason to define the key terms. We only award application marks for data/contextual references which actually support the point being made Marks will only be awarded for the explanation and evaluation of the measures/factors so candidates should start immediately with the first measure. Without evaluation answers are limited to 6/8 marks.Ĭandidates should not spend too much time on long introductions. Two small pieces of evaluation or one more developed point is all that is required.
Two correct factors explained in context are required. Candidates need to offer some evaluation of their answer. In this question the marks are evenly divided between knowledge, application, analysis, and evaluation (2 marks for each).
0 kommentar(er)
